14 posts
|
Post by Sizzling Sexpots on Feb 19, 2016 18:13:00 GMT -5
 Simon Nessman for John Galliano Boxers I feel the body pose here really exposes the viewer to all of Simon's perfect body parts, as well as bringing the model closer to the shot and making it more exciting by having it shot on top of a motorcycle. |
|
|
|
Post by Janice Dickinson on Feb 21, 2016 4:30:16 GMT -5
There's not much in terms of negatives apart from the weird contortions your body is making. That could have something to do with you lying on top of a motor cycle. Your face is near flawless, though I would've liked to see your eyes, they're squinting too much here. I also wish there was more of a way to put the attention on the boxers a bit more.
I'm also a little bit concerned by how smooth and featureless the jocks are...
|
|
672 posts
|
Post by Hikaru Utada on Feb 21, 2016 4:48:26 GMT -5
Holy shit! Where did your eyes go?
You know how to appease me giving me a scantily-clad hot guy. I have been fine with the objectification of women as long as men start being objectified, too. Equality. I'm not at all concerned with how your body is contorted in this picture (I'd like to see just how flexible you are); I think it shows off your muscles nicely. Like Janice, though, I am a bit concerned with the lack of... definition in that area and with the product you're selling, that's where we should be looking, anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Morgan Freeman on Feb 21, 2016 18:29:31 GMT -5
You look so relaxed and in control that I wouldn't have thought you were laying on an object that swivels and turns. You have a very muscular body and a face that is naturally sexy so it doesn't take much effort for you to be sexy in a photo, but I don't feel like you are necessarily selling anything. If anything I feel like you are selling the motorbike more. There's no interaction between you and the product, maybe a finger hooked under the elastic might have drawn my attention more to your product.
|
|
